Who really is going to open and close every overhead bin? Every armrest and window shade? Why not just some, say at over-wing seats where, if ever anyone is going to use them, that would be most likely where. Together with the hundreds of animations in the VC and External model, + FSX limitations, no wonder its tough to have one model (beside the poly count).ĭo we really need all those PAX cabin animations. So much effort The number of animations in the PAX cabin is not listed in the manual, so I made a count įirst Class Entertainment screens pop-out/stow = 12ĥ13 animations (give or take some I may have missed)! Wow!! but Why? OK so a cropped version will be offered with the flight deck So why make the entire PAX cabin in the first place then? As an advert for what CS can do, for looking at while standing at the gate? But that just defeats all the amazing realism built into this cabin model anyhow. They make a really stunning PAX cabin (one of CS's strong points and a major selling point), and then make it so that its unusable in flight (OK I guess you could get that model up in the air using some of the 2D panels, but without a radio and overhead panel I don't know how one would do this). For the life of me I cannot understand CS's logic here.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |